Видео

German Idealism

2:53:49 guilt

Those of us who see the destruction of the world and understand its consequences live labelled as mentally ill

Schopenhauer's World as Will and Representation will blow you away, you'll love it T. Reading Subarashiki hibi on your recommendation

soy video

Any such commentary on critique of pure reason on yt?

nice

Read Ibn Rushd

this is the chaddiest video ever

extremely based

Thanks a lot for this. I’m not super intelligent and I was struggling to get through this book, until I found this video.

This has served me as a good refresher. Thank you. I attended & recently reviewed Drefus' lectures and later worked w/ his student, Fred Doland, in a course called "Heigegger for Artists."

very interesting to see this after reading both early and late wittgenstein. very nice. Also Hegel when?

thank you so so much

pls come back bro we need you

Man! I love ur stuff Dude- you absolutely totalt bad ass Do not worry about anything please - you are a true gem Thank you for being you- your videos makes my day! Love from , Kristiansand Norway

I can see why christianity and islam became so popular, they are simple and easy for 80 iq men to grasp, unlike this.

nothing exists as its own; nothing has its own entity; everything is changing.. hence that the Sunyata; But sunyata itself has no entity ..

The real elephant in the room is that his analysis and conclusion about the nature of the Jews was wholly accurate.

So it is reached through quantum physics too! As above so below, as they say...

thank you

1. control 2. deception 3. blame 4. furthering control 5. demoralisation 6. reasons to repair for the first five stages. 7. complete control for the good of all.

Gonna be real with you. I ain't watching all of that, but I respect the work you put into it. Love Subahibi btw

Is physical dependence contingent on a rejection of atomism?

Video starts at 3:59

This is the best break down I’ve seen of “Being and time” here on YT…as clear and concise as it possibly could be for a book such as this one. Excellent work!!

youre better than university professors, like wtf man, how can it be?

can you plz share the slides

While I absolutely disagree with the notion that we can separate the man from the thought, I do believe that his work - as well as that of others with questionable associations and decisions, a la Ezra Pound - is nonetheless invaluable and worthy of earnest study.

Put this way M. Heidegger is crystal clear understood, thank you.

Another so called Christian, trying to go his own way, reinvent the wheel and came up with a square. How old is this story? Brought up in a Christian home and society. Can’t cut it, can’t figure it out. So, what does the human do? Christianity does not align or flow with natural reason or inclination. It’s counter intuitive. So again, what does the human do? Well, if he’s like most all of us, he makes up his own way, that’s easiest, makes easy sense to his natural yearnings. I’ll tell you this, Christianity is like golf. It’s counter intuitive. You are hitting a huge slice and the ball keeps going way way to the right. So how does the mind, the whole being of the golfer think feel and do? Everything obviously and logically tells the golfer to swing and hit and aim more to the LEFT, duh! The ball is going way to the right, so I’m not a dummy, so I’m going more to the left. In theory, the ball should now go straight. WRONG FOOL !!!! The ball is slicing to the right precisely because you are swinging the club TO the left. It’s counter intuitive. So is Christianity. That’s why most people fail miserably at living it, thinking it through. They make up their own false way and fail. Now, I personally couldn’t and don’t accept such miserable, baffling failure in my life or my golf game. Not to be a D-bag here, but I’ll tell u the truth. I put a 62 on my golf Wednesday golf group last month. 10 birdies no bogies. The came back the following week a threw a 65 at em’. Oh, that’s when they ALL started bitching and complaining. Cause the skins money mostly ended up in my pocket. One guy congratulated and gave me some respect. Only one. I took the time, the effort, the THOUGHT, the frustration, the prayer, to figure out firstly what is really happening in space and time, where is the club itself supposed to go? Then, HOW it’s supposed to get there, as in what do all these different parts of my body DO, in order to move the club through space? THEN, that’s not good enough, the different parts of the club, AND the different parts of the body have to move correctly, NUT, they now have to move correctly AT THE rRIGHT TIME too!!! Synchronicity I think it’s called. Not easy to do man. I’m telling you. Cause I’ve done it. So now I look at almost ALL golfers when I go to the range. I understand they will always play poorly because they’re so far away. The concepts, the body training, the sync. The flow. The idea as a whole. They’re so far off. Same with Christianity. Living it. Doing it. Experience it and it makes PERFECT sense. Life is based on sacrifice at the end and the beginning. The universe is based on this. It’s counter intuitive to natural man. That’s why we suck at life, like our golf game. But…… If not for Logos, the WAY, if not for Jesus Christ, being himself the truth, full of grace and mercy, I would always suck at life, just like I’d always suck at golf, like ALMOST all men and women. Heidegger failed at christianity, shot a 120. As a young man, with a bad or no teacher, of course. Who wouldn’t fail? We all did. But he gave up and made up his own game, a different game. Went his own way. A short cut. But as he found out, it didn’t turn out to be a short cut. It was a LONG cut AND!!!!! It goes to NOWHRE. Heidegger, will get you lost.?he is a failed Christian. No 62, no promised land. He’s worth reading and understanding in the way as to learn what not to do. Don’t listen to people at the golf range tell you their little theories on the golf swing when even in their dreams at night, they don’t and couldn’t shoot a 62. They have no clue of the truth. Blind leading the blind as Jesus said. Any whoo, I have been writing WAY too long. Gotta go. And yes, I’m headed to the golf course. Good luck with YOUR score. Maybe Heidegger will help you. But I know the truth don’t I? I told you the answer. Now, you have to deal with your Natural WILL, like Heidegger had to in his life. Miserable score, miserable conclusion. Miserable life did Heidegger exhibit. Good luck

Awesome! But maybe it's better to use "eastern" rather than "Japanese" at 9:51? Both "Zen" (as a branch of Chinese Buddhism, influencing Japanese Zen a lot) and "Taoist" originated in China. Only "Shinto" is purely Japanese?

I have little knowledge about philosophy, but as a software developer the way his facts and states of affairs are constructed feels really familiar to me. I was reminded of logical gates and boolean logic.

Bicycle is technology?

Thank you for making this video. On terminology, you don't mention translating Befindlichkeit as " attunement.". Stambough is not the only translator to use that tetm. See also Fundamental Concepts....translated by McNeill and Walker. I find the term "attunement" to be useful

I hope you return with another great video, your essays on Heidegger were one of a kind!

This is excellent, thank you so much

He wanted to lay out truth but I don’t think he ever intended to be understood

Yer a legend 🙌

What *is* the meaning of "is", anyway? 🤔🧠

i'd love if you could do a similair video on wittgenstein's later philosophy in the philosophical investigations, thank you for your videos

This video is breathtaking!

Holy shit this is amazing.

Got back here after a while. Dharma is in one sense analytical, but in another very deep, beautiful and poetic. The most beautiful and profound thought humanity has ever created. May everyone be peaceful and free of suffering.

This is a good content, congratulations! I don't agree with every interpretation but it's clear that you care about the subject. Just a zuggestion: you should improve you understanding of ancient Greek, otherwise it is not easy to really understand what Heidegger gest right and what he gets partially wrong.

Thank you! May i request an analysis of 'philosophical investigations' by Wittgenstein? Your video about the tractatus was amazing, and given your clarity of explaination it would be great!